Colonial Histories and Vädda Primitivism
Part One: A Genealogy of Vädda Primitivism
The most important Western representation of the Vädda that set the stamp for later characterizations comes from Robert Knox who for the first time in 1681 typologized the Vädda as the "wild man."2
Of these there be two sorts, Wild and Tame.... For as in these Woods there are Wild Beasts, so Wild Men also. The Land of Bintan is all covered with mighty Woods, filled with abundance of Deer. In this Land are many of these wild men: they call themselves Veddahs, dwelling near no other Inhabitants. They speak the Chingulayes [Sinhala's] Language.... They never till the ground for Corn, their Food being only Flesh.3
Knox has a wonderful picture captioned as "A Veddah or Wild Man" with his bow and arrow and dagger, smoking a huge pipe and wearing a thick loin cloth. He then goes on to describe the tame Väddas who owe service obligations to the king, especially tusks, honey and wax and deer's flesh which they bring to the gabadage or royal store-house. In Knox the fundamental distinction is between wild and tame based, we now know, on a primordial European distinction between nature and culture, the wild ones living in a state of nature without the benefits of culture.4 Hence, says Knox, they are also called Ramba-Väddahs or hairy Väddas who, as children of nature, "never shew themselves."5 He had fleeting glimpses of them when he was running away from the Kandyan kingdom, but he could not possibly have had a close look. Consequently, Knox's representation the wild Vädda must be seen as a product of his fertile imagination as he conveyed it to the engraver of his text. But what is the significance of the caption "Wild Man"? I suggest that Knox invented this portrait of the wild man because that is something his late 17th century English public expected to hear.
Neither Knox nor the later scholarly endeavors on the so-called primitive peoples can be understood outside the larger European context of the fascination with the "wild man." Richard Bernheimer in his book, Wild Men in the Middle Ages has beautifully documented this European obsession. Hayden White, and more recently Roger Batra, has recently reexamined this topic.6 And Margaret Hodgen has demonstrated that after the so-called voyages of discovery, the human monsters and wild men of the European middle-ages was being foisted on the savage, on occasion providing a rationale for the extermination of native peoples. When Columbus traveled into the new world of the Caribbean, he did not find any monstrous beings. Yet he had hesitant references to Amazonians, to a tribe without hair and, in another interesting European representation of wildness, to tailed men or homo caudatus in a remote part of Cuba.7 These ideas sometimes affected physical perception: thus in 1560 the Spanish thought they saw giant men in Patagonia which is the land of "patagones" or "big feet."8 As late as 1765 the English circumnavigator Byron claimed to have seen giants in Patagonia.
It was Wallis and Carteret who a few years later disabused the English public regarding Patagonian giants.9 The popular ideas of the wild man also affected science and other forms of literature. For example, the great Linneaus in his System of Nature not only classified the world's fauna and flora but also typologized humans into homo sapiens and homo monstrosus, and among the former were wild men. Even religious reformers like John Wesley were influenced by similar notions of savages as wild men, not fully human.10
The image of the Vädda as the wild man continued into colonial texts both Portuguese and Dutch, though the former did indicate that while Väddas were no doubt hunters, if not gatherers, they were also fierce warriors. These colonial texts generally resulted in a narrowing of the Väddas as primitive peoples. Early anthropology enshrined this view of the Vädda in 1881 in one of the first standard texts by Sir Edward Tylor: "In the forests of Ceylon are found the Veddas or 'hunters', shy wild men who build bough huts, and live on game and wild honey."11 Parallel with the cultural typification of the Vädda as primitive went a physical typification by very distinguished physical anthropologists such as the Doctors F. and P. Sarasin and Rudolf Virchow, who in grand style measured their scalps, took body measurements, characterized the shape of their noses and hair and systematically defined the Vädda in physical terms.12 The wild Vädda was now given identifying physical features through what one feminist scholar has felicitously labeled the "calipers of the patriarchs." It was now possible to talk confidently of the Veddoid type in contrast to the Sinhala (without seriously examining whether there were Sinhalas who shared these features). These physical anthropologists and early colonial historians were the first to define the Väddas as "aborigines," though their studies were totally demolished by one of the most discerning of colonial historians, Henry Parker, who wrote sympathetically about Väddas. Though respectful of Virchow and others, Parker says that the wild Väddas he knew had hair "no more frizzly than that of ordinary Sinhalese. ... [It] is tied in a knot at the back of the head, exactly like that of all Sinhalese. ... There is nothing in the figure (except the smaller height), the features, or the ordinary coiffure, and very little in the average colour of the skin, to distinguish the Vädda from many low-caste Kandians found in the northern and north-west Sinhalese districts.13 Some colonial historians thought that Väddas wore leafy garments to cover their nudity which is a detail intrinsic to the European conception of the wild man.14 Väddas were never nude; and in any case branches were hardly a sensible way to cover ones nudity. Again it was Parker who showed that when Kandyan Sinhalas and Vanniyars stalked animals they used to disguise themselves by wearing such twigs or branches round their waists, as the Väddas also probably did.15
Perhaps as a result of early pseudo-scientific studies the Väddas achieved a kind of popular notoriety. Many Europeans wanted to see the Vädda as a specimen of the wild man, or a copy of the primitive Australian aborigine, from the comfort of the Government Rest (Guest) House, for it was widely believed, on the flimsiest evidence, that the Väddas were culturally, genetically and physiologically related to the Australian aborigines. The Seligmanns noted in their classic work on the Väddas:
The Veddas have long been regarded as a curiosity in Ceylon and excite almost as much interest as the ruined cities, hence Europeans go to the nearest Rest House on the main road and have the Danigala Veddas brought to them. Naturally the Veddas felt uncomfortable and shy at first, but when they found that they had only to look gruff and grunt replies in order to receive presents they were quite clever enough to keep up the pose. In this they were aided by the always agreeable villagers ever ready to give the white man exactly what he wanted. The white man appeared to be immensely anxious to see a true Vedda, a wild man of the woods, clad only in a scanty loin cloth, carrying his bow and arrows on which he depended for his subsistence, simple and untrained, indeed, little removed from the very animals he hunted.16
Naturally the European curiosity was satisfied by the Nilgala headrnen who brought Väddas properly attired as wild men to show them to the European. The Väddas of Dambana were also easily accessible from the Government Rest House at Alutnuvara. The Seligmanns somewhat unfairly called them "show Veddas" because they "have been sent for so often by white visitors that they have learnt certain tricks, which they show directly they see a European."17 Village Väddas were also not exempt from these performances of what I would call "self-primitivization." Parker notes that photos of village Väddas were exhibited in Kandy to "represent men with wild unkempt frizzly locks; but I have never seen anything of the kind in their own districts, and it is probable that the heads of those who have been so portrayed have been 'made up' specially to increase their wild appearance," a fact confirmed, says Parker, by their Sinhala neighbors.18 Both the Danigala and Dambana Väddas were no longer exclusively hunters; they had for a long time taken to hena or swidden cultivation, even keeping cattle, and lived in close contact with neighboring Sinhalas. In the early part of the 20th century a few continued to use bows and arrows; others had shotguns, while yet others borrowed guns from the Sinhala.19 A picture that appeared in the New York Times sometime ago by Viveca Stegborn, a Vädda rights activist, showing Väddas of Maha Oya carrying bows and arrows and in a stalking posture must very likely have been posed to convey the idea of "indigenous people" living close to nature and now being threatened by extermination - a hugely successful ploy as far as the UN committee on the rights of indigenous people were concerned. Today's Väddas, unlike their predecessors, are abysmally poor archers; I can vouch that for a fact from our personal knowledge of them in the field.
It seems the Väddas of Dambana and Danigala (no longer a Vädda enclave) had taken over the persona of the wild man expected of them by the European. Theirs was a mimesis of savageness: half naked, carrying a bow and arrow and displaying its uses, gruff, morose, distant and glum. Some colonial observers even said that the Väddas did not have a language; others that the Väddas did not laugh. All this was simply a phenomenon of Väddas acting the wild man role, but done so well as to fool Europeans; and I am sure that Väddas, like good actors, enjoyed playing that role. Thus the Vädda as a "wild man" was being created for the European by the not-so-wild Väddas. Soon this image was being perpetuated for those Sinhala middle class people who, in their own mimesis of colonialism, have imbibed much of the Vädda mythology created by the European. I have seen Dambana Väddas during the 1950s and 1960s line the road to Mahiyangana carrying their bows and arrows waiting to perform their act of wildness, at which they were now past-masters. They also demonstrated to the awed Sinhalas the nature of their strange language, now known as vädi basava or "Vädda language," helping thereby to further distance Vädda from Sinhala. Today both Sinhala and foreign tourists line up to take photographs of the present Vädda chief, a lone symbol of a vanishing primitive "tribe," along with fellow "aborigines" or ādivāsi in his own no-longer-very-primitive environment.
The first modern work on the ethnography of the Väddas was that of the Seligmanns in their classic study The Veddas published in 1911 based on actual fieldwork. Yet, although they made acute observations on Vädda religion the Seligmanns too were paradoxically caught in the dilemma of representing the "true," "pure," or "genuine" Vädda.20 For them "show Väddas" were phony Väddas whereas true Väddas displayed unique physical and cultural characteristics. Right through this important book the Seligmanns are concerned with "pure Väddas," some of whom are "purer" than others, pure and purer being defined in terms of three criteria, namely, physical appearance, blood and cultural integrity. Thus the Seligmanns have a three-fold classification: Väddas, Village Väddas and Coast Väddas, and only the first are the true Väddas. The coast Väddas are the least interesting because "they have much Tamil blood in their veins, and though often taller than pure Veddas, some still retain an appearance which suggests their Vedda origin."21 The Seligmanns give short shrift to village Väddas in general and are especially harsh on those, like the Malgode Väddas of Sorabora, who have "dropped their old Vedda customs so entirely that the local Sinhalese no longer look upon them as true village Veddas."22 Finally the Seligmanns are totally dismissive of those Väddas who are "half-bred" and "degenerate" and "will soon be entirely lost among the Sinhalese."23
Given their interest in the "real" Vädda, one would have thought that the Seligmanns would be able to deal with them at length, but there weren't many left. The Danigala Väddas were physically pure but culturally Sinhala; and the Kovil Vannamai were "badly off and in varying conditions of ill health and malnutrition." The Seligmanns report that "after visiting so many decaying or degenerate communities a refreshing state of affairs was found at Sitala Vanniya." This was the only group that represented both physical and cultural integrity but unfortunately for the Seligmanns there were only four families left!24 It seems that the Seligmanns' construction of Vädda culture and society was based on these four families supplemented by imaginative reconstructions of "genuine" Vädda culture from the other groups they visited. They could not for a moment recognize that those not-so-pure, play-acting Väddas who lived by pastoralism, swidden (hena) cultivation and hunting might have important information on their own life-ways than those poverty-stricken hunting and cave dwelling Väddas they studied for their ever-elusive purity of blood and culture.
|Living Heritage Trust ©2016 All Rights Reserved|